Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42289995›Full record

ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2026

Cardiovascular Risk Estimation and Statin Adherence: A Historical Cohort Study.

Samuel Finnikin, Brian Willis, Tim Evans, Brian Finney, Kwan Nok Chris Hui, Rani Khatib, Tom Marshall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samuel FinnikinDepartment of Applied Health Sciences College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4353-4323
Brian WillisDepartment of Applied Health Sciences College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Tim EvansOffice for Health Improvement and Disparities, Department of Health and Social Care, UK.
Brian FinneyLay.
Kwan Nok Chris HuiDepartment of Applied Health Sciences College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Rani KhatibCardiology Department, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Tom MarshallDepartment of Applied Health Sciences College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9277-5214

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdherence to statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is low but may be improved through shared decision making (SDM). CVD risk estimation is fundamental to SDM at statin initiation, and the absence of a CVD risk score may indicate that SDM has not taken place. This study explores statin initiation decisions by investigating whether CVD risk is associated with adherence to statins and CVD outcomes.

designA cohort of statin-naïve patients aged 40 to 84 y initiated on statins for primary prevention between 2017 and 2020 was identified and categorized by the presence or absence of a CVD risk score at statin initiation. Multivariable modeling determined the association between CVD risk score and statin adherence and persistence. A secondary analysis investigated the relationship with CVD outcomes and death.

resultsA total of 255,730 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 4.6 y. The presence of a CVD risk score (67.7% of patients) was associated with a 7% increase in adherence and an 8% reduction in discontinuations as well as a 15% reduction in CVD and all-cause mortality.

conclusionThe presence of a CVD risk score is associated with improvements in both adherence and persistence, which could indicate that the quality of initiation consultations, and a focus on SDM, improves the utility of statins. In addition, CVD risk scoring is associated with a large decrease in CVD/death, which cannot fully be explained by improvements in statin adherence and persistence, an important finding necessitating further investigation. IMPLICATIONS: Efforts to improve the integration of CVD risk scores and SDM in statin initiation consultations may significantly improve statin utilization and CVD outcomes.HighlightsWe present a comprehensive assessment of the adherence to and persistence with statins for the primary prevention of CVD, which, for the first time, is linked to the presence or absence of CVD risk scoring.CVD risk scoring is associated with improvements in both adherence and persistence as well as significant reductions in CVD and all-cause mortality.There should be renewed focus on the content of statin initiation consultations ensuring that CVD risk is communicated using a shared decision-making approach.Further consideration should be given to the important discrepancy in CVD and death seen when CVD risk scoring is, and is not, used in practice.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDecision Making, SharedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary PreventionRisk AssessmentHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitorscardiovascular diseaseHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitorsmedication adherenceshared decision making

Identifiers

PMID42289995
PMCPMC13714227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.