ArticleMedical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making2026
Cardiovascular Risk Estimation and Statin Adherence: A Historical Cohort Study.
Article in Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdherence to statins for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is low but may be improved through shared decision making (SDM). CVD risk estimation is fundamental to SDM at statin initiation, and the absence of a CVD risk score may indicate that SDM has not taken place. This study explores statin initiation decisions by investigating whether CVD risk is associated with adherence to statins and CVD outcomes.
designA cohort of statin-naïve patients aged 40 to 84 y initiated on statins for primary prevention between 2017 and 2020 was identified and categorized by the presence or absence of a CVD risk score at statin initiation. Multivariable modeling determined the association between CVD risk score and statin adherence and persistence. A secondary analysis investigated the relationship with CVD outcomes and death.
resultsA total of 255,730 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 4.6 y. The presence of a CVD risk score (67.7% of patients) was associated with a 7% increase in adherence and an 8% reduction in discontinuations as well as a 15% reduction in CVD and all-cause mortality.
conclusionThe presence of a CVD risk score is associated with improvements in both adherence and persistence, which could indicate that the quality of initiation consultations, and a focus on SDM, improves the utility of statins. In addition, CVD risk scoring is associated with a large decrease in CVD/death, which cannot fully be explained by improvements in statin adherence and persistence, an important finding necessitating further investigation. IMPLICATIONS: Efforts to improve the integration of CVD risk scores and SDM in statin initiation consultations may significantly improve statin utilization and CVD outcomes.HighlightsWe present a comprehensive assessment of the adherence to and persistence with statins for the primary prevention of CVD, which, for the first time, is linked to the presence or absence of CVD risk scoring.CVD risk scoring is associated with improvements in both adherence and persistence as well as significant reductions in CVD and all-cause mortality.There should be renewed focus on the content of statin initiation consultations ensuring that CVD risk is communicated using a shared decision-making approach.Further consideration should be given to the important discrepancy in CVD and death seen when CVD risk scoring is, and is not, used in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.