Article in Plant, cell & environment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Zhenzhen ZhuFrontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding, State Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency Production of Wheat-Maize Double Cropping, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Fangyao SunFrontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding, State Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency Production of Wheat-Maize Double Cropping, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Yanpeng DingFrontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding, State Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency Production of Wheat-Maize Double Cropping, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Fuping ZhangFrontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding, State Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency Production of Wheat-Maize Double Cropping, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Xi HeFrontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding, State Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency Production of Wheat-Maize Double Cropping, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Zhongfu NiFrontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding, State Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency Production of Wheat-Maize Double Cropping, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4524-7720
Qixin SunFrontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding, State Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency Production of Wheat-Maize Double Cropping, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Zhenqi SuFrontiers Science Center for Molecular Design Breeding, State Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency Production of Wheat-Maize Double Cropping, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1362-0949
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFD1201500National Key Research and Development Program of China 2023YFD1201004
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Knockout of TaCKX2.2 in Wheat Improved Grain Yield by Increasing Grain Number Per Spike and Grain Size Under Field Production Conditions. · full record | OpenQuestion