Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42289802›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of haematology2026

Minimal residual disease in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after first-line therapy: Defining the continuum from metabolic remission to molecular clearance.

Santino Caserta, Enrica Antonia Martino, Ernesto Vigna, Antonella Bruzzese, Mamdouh Skafi, Nicola Amodio, Eugenio Lucia, Virginia Olivito, Caterina Labanca, Francesco Mendicino and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Santino CasertaHematology Unit, Department of Onco-Hematology, AO of Cosenza, Cosenza, Italy.
Enrica Antonia MartinoHematology Unit, Department of Onco-Hematology, AO of Cosenza, Cosenza, Italy.
Ernesto VignaHematology Unit, Department of Onco-Hematology, AO of Cosenza, Cosenza, Italy.
Antonella BruzzeseHematology Unit, Department of Onco-Hematology, AO of Cosenza, Cosenza, Italy.
Mamdouh SkafiEmergency and Internal Medicine Department, Saint Joseph Hospital, East Jerusalem, Palestine.
Nicola AmodioDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Eugenio LuciaHematology Unit, Department of Onco-Hematology, AO of Cosenza, Cosenza, Italy.
Virginia OlivitoHematology Unit, Department of Onco-Hematology, AO of Cosenza, Cosenza, Italy.
Caterina LabancaHematology Unit, Department of Onco-Hematology, AO of Cosenza, Cosenza, Italy.
Francesco MendicinoHematology Unit, Department of Onco-Hematology, AO of Cosenza, Cosenza, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6339-632X
Maria Eugenia AlvaroEmergency and Internal Medicine Department, Saint Joseph Hospital, East Jerusalem, Palestine.
Fortunato MorabitoAIL Sezione di Cosenza, Cosenza, Italy.
Massimo GentileHematology Unit, Department of Onco-Hematology, AO of Cosenza, Cosenza, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5256-0726

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Response assessment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has traditionally relied on anatomical and metabolic imaging, with fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)-defined complete metabolic remission representing the principal end-point of first-line therapy. However, growing evidence indicates that metabolic control does not necessarily correspond to clonal eradication. Circulating tumour deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA)-based minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment offers a complementary perspective by detecting systemic clonal persistence rather than localized tumour burden. In this review, we synthesize biological, methodological and clinical evidence showing that PET and MRD capture distinct and only partially overlapping dimensions of treatment response. We discuss biological implications of PET-negative/MRD-positive status, which may represent occult residual disease driven by subthreshold metabolic activity, diffuse low-volume dissemination or microenvironment-mediated resistance. MRD may therefore refine prognostic stratification beyond PET, particularly among patients achieving complete metabolic responses. Nevertheless, technical variability, limited standardization and insufficient prospective validation currently limit its use as a routine therapeutic decision trigger. Emerging frameworks integrating PET and MRD, especially within adaptive clinical trials, conceptualize response as a dynamic biological process rather than a static classification. Overall, metabolic remission likely reflects control of dominant tumour compartments, whereas MRD detection identifies persisting therapy-resistant clones. Integrating both dimensions may improve interpretation and guide therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseNeoplasm, ResidualFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansPositron-Emission TomographyPrognosisRemission InductionFluorodeoxyglucose F18circulating tumour DNAclonal persistencediffuse large B‐cell lymphomaFDG‐PETminimal residual diseaserelapseresponse assessment

Identifiers

PMID42289802
PMCPMC13462154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.