ReviewBritish journal of haematology2026
Minimal residual disease in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after first-line therapy: Defining the continuum from metabolic remission to molecular clearance.
Review in British journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Minimal Residual Disease as a Biological Trait: Rethinking Disease Persistence in Hematologic Malignancies.European journal of haematology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Response assessment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has traditionally relied on anatomical and metabolic imaging, with fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)-defined complete metabolic remission representing the principal end-point of first-line therapy. However, growing evidence indicates that metabolic control does not necessarily correspond to clonal eradication. Circulating tumour deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA)-based minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment offers a complementary perspective by detecting systemic clonal persistence rather than localized tumour burden. In this review, we synthesize biological, methodological and clinical evidence showing that PET and MRD capture distinct and only partially overlapping dimensions of treatment response. We discuss biological implications of PET-negative/MRD-positive status, which may represent occult residual disease driven by subthreshold metabolic activity, diffuse low-volume dissemination or microenvironment-mediated resistance. MRD may therefore refine prognostic stratification beyond PET, particularly among patients achieving complete metabolic responses. Nevertheless, technical variability, limited standardization and insufficient prospective validation currently limit its use as a routine therapeutic decision trigger. Emerging frameworks integrating PET and MRD, especially within adaptive clinical trials, conceptualize response as a dynamic biological process rather than a static classification. Overall, metabolic remission likely reflects control of dominant tumour compartments, whereas MRD detection identifies persisting therapy-resistant clones. Integrating both dimensions may improve interpretation and guide therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.