ArticleIsrael journal of health policy research2026
From exception to insight: a phenomenological study of quality managers' perspectives on the individual appeals in the National Healthcare Quality Program.
Article in Israel journal of health policy research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNational quality indicators play a crucial role in monitoring hospital performance and fostering accountability. However, standardized indicators often fail to capture the intricate realities of clinical practice. To mitigate this limitation, Israel's National Program for Quality Indicators for general, geriatric, and psychiatric hospitals has implemented an individual appeals process, enabling hospitals to request case-based exclusions from indicator calculations when performance deviations arise from factors beyond their control. After three years of this initiative, our goal is to investigate the experiences of hospital Quality Managers (QMs) with the individual appeals track, aiming to inform enhancements to the national quality indicators program.
methodsA qualitative, phenomenological study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with ten QMs from general, geriatric, and psychiatric hospitals. Interviews were analyzed using thematic, textual, and content analysis.
resultsThree core themes emerged: (1) Knowledge and familiarity gaps - most QMs relied on experiential learning rather than formal training or Ministry guidelines; (2) Communication gaps - strong collaboration existed within hospitals and with supervising nurses, but limited dialogue and feedback occurred with higher Ministry levels or across institutions; (3) Recognition gaps - QMs perceived acceptance of appeals as professional validation, while rejections often evoked frustration and a sense of underappreciating.
conclusionsQMs' experiences highlight systemic gaps in training, communication, and recognition that influence the perceived legitimacy and effectiveness of the individual appeals track. Strengthening structured onboarding, establishing transparent two-way communication, and embedding formal recognition mechanisms could enhance motivation, professional confidence, and the program's credibility. POLICY IMPLICATIONS: Institutionalizing the appeals process as a formal policy tool supported by standardized training, inter-hospital learning forums, and routine feedback loops can transform it from a technical exception mechanism into a strategic platform for continuous quality improvement and policy learning within Israel's healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.