Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42289747›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2026

Nationwide seroprevalence of canine vector-borne pathogens in dogs in Spain.

Ana Montoya-Matute, Rocío Checa, Clara Gómez-Velasco, Rosa Gálvez, Isabel Mendoza, Juliana Sarquis, Juan P Barrera, Efrén Estévez-Sánchez, Daniela García-Rupérez, Guadalupe Miró

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ana Montoya-MatuteAnimal Health Department, Veterinary Faculty, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Rocío ChecaMicrobiology and Parasitology Department, Pharmacy Faculty, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Clara Gómez-VelascoAnimal Health Department, Veterinary Faculty, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Rosa GálvezDepartment of Specific Didactics, School of Education and Teacher Training, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Isabel MendozaAnimal Health Department, Veterinary Faculty, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Juliana SarquisAnimal Health Department, Veterinary Faculty, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Juan P BarreraAnimal Health Department, Veterinary Faculty, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Efrén Estévez-SánchezAnimal Health Department, Veterinary Faculty, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Daniela García-RupérezAnimal Health Department, Veterinary Faculty, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Guadalupe MiróAnimal Health Department, Veterinary Faculty, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. gmiro@ucm.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCanine vector-borne diseases (CVBDs) are a health risk for both dogs and humans. This nationwide study sought to determine the seropositivity of Leishmania infantum and Ehrlichia canis and the positivity of Dirofilaria immitis, the main vector-borne pathogens prevalent in Europe, in apparently healthy dogs from Spain. Possible associations between seropositivity/positivity and epidemiological variables were also assessed, respectively.

methodsIn a survey conducted in all Spanish 50 provinces, 11,886 dogs from 609 veterinary clinics were tested using the URANOvet® diagnostic rapid test to detect D. immitis antigen, and antibodies against L. infantum and E. canis. Data were collected regarding sex, age, habitat, clinical signs compatible with each pathogen and the regular use of ectoparasiticides.

resultsThe overall seropositivity was 17.3% (1915/11,048) for L. infantum, and 3.4% (315/9,125) for E. canis. Positivity for D. immitis was 3.2% (314/9,938). A considerable proportion of infected dogs showed no clinical signs, representing 17.7% of L. infantum, 64.1% of D. immitis, and 35.9% of E. canis positive cases. Significant differences in the epidemiological variables examined (P < 0.05) were related to seropositivy/positivity for the three pathogens examined, including geographic location, habitat, associated clinical signs and use of ectoparasiticides. While a higher seropositivity of L. infantum and positivity for D. immitis antigen were recorded in older dogs (P < 0.001), male dogs showed a higher seropositivity of L. infantum (P < 0.001).

conclusionsThese data suggest that dogs in Spain are consistently exposed to all three vector-borne pathogens analysed. Veterinarians should include these CVBDs in their differential diagnoses and encourage the use of repellents and other prophylactic measures to prevent their transmission by arthropod vectors, considering regional epidemiological risk and lifestyle. Our findings also highlight the need for early detection by routine screening of clinically healthy dogs, as they could be important subclinical carriers.

Indexed as

DirofilariasisDog DiseasesEhrlichiosisLeishmaniasis, VisceralVector Borne DiseasesAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, HelminthAntibodies, ProtozoanDirofilaria immitisDogsEhrlichia canisFemaleLeishmania infantumMaleSeroepidemiologic StudiesAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, HelminthAntibodies, ProtozoanCVBD (Canine Vector Borne-Diseases)Dirofilaria immitisDogEhrlichia canisLeishmania infantumPositivitySeropositivitySpain

Identifiers

PMID42289747
PMCPMC13491873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.