ArticleBMC psychology2026
High social anxiety is associated with attenuated cognitive-control modulation in a mixed threat-neutral context: evidence from ERPs and time-frequency analysis.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High social anxiety has been linked to impaired attentional control, yet its influence on stimulus-sensitive cognitive-control modulation in mixed threat-neutral contexts remains unclear. The present study examined cognitive-control-related behavioral and neural processing in individuals with high social anxiety (HSA) during an emotional Stroop task in which neutral and social threat words were randomly intermixed. Behaviorally, the HSA group responded more slowly than the low social anxiety (LSA) group, despite comparable accuracy across groups and conditions. In addition, responses to threat words were faster than those to neutral words across groups. At the neural level, neutral words elicited larger N2 and N450 amplitudes than threat words, and these differentiation effects were more pronounced in the LSA group than in the HSA group. Likewise, the LSA group showed clearer late-stage modulation in SP, whereas this effect was attenuated in the HSA group. In the time-frequency domain, theta power was stronger in the LSA group than in the HSA group, and neutral words elicited stronger alpha desynchronization than threat words in the HSA group. Taken together, these findings suggest that HSA is associated with reduced processing efficiency and attenuated stimulus-sensitive cognitive-control modulation in a mixed threat-neutral context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.