ReviewJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026
Targeting cardiac myosin in HFrEF: mechanism, clinical evidence, and the role of omecamtiv mecarbil.
Review in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The morbidity and mortality associated with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remain high despite significant advances in treatment. Current guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT) primarily target neurohormonal pathways. However, traditional positive inotropes, which enhance contractility, are limited by adverse events including increased myocardial oxygen consumption and arrhythmogenesis. Omecamtiv Mecarbil (OM) is a first-in-class selective cardiac myosin activator that addresses this gap by directly targeting the cardiac sarcomere. OM binds to cardiac myosin, stabilizing it in a force-generating state, thereby prolonging systolic ejection time and improving contractility without increasing intracellular calcium or heart rate. The Phase III GALACTIC-HF trial, which enrolled over 8,200 patients with HFrEF, reported an 8% relative risk reduction in the composite endpoint of heart failure events or cardiovascular death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-0.99, P = 0.025). This benefit was primarily driven by a reduction in heart failure hospitalizations, with no significant difference in cardiovascular mortality. Subgroup analysis revealed that the clinical benefit was most pronounced in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤ 28%. OM was generally well-tolerated, with a safety profile comparable to placebo, though it possesses a narrow therapeutic window, with higher plasma concentrations associated with an increased risk of ischemic events. In summary, OM represents a novel, mechanistically distinct therapeutic option for symptomatic HFrEF patients, particularly those with severe systolic dysfunction, who remain at high risk despite optimized GDMT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.