ArticleHarm reduction journal2026
Influence of sponsorship on betting intentions: from linear to deep learning models.
Article in Harm reduction journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sports sponsorship by commercial betting providers is an essential source of income for sports entities worldwide. This study examines the formation of betting behavior in sporting events using predictor variables, namely, self-congruence, perceived exposure, subjective norms, goodwill, and involvement, to predict betting intention and actual gambling behavior, comparing linear (PLS-SEM) and nonlinear (artificial neural networks-ANN) methods. Data from 661 Spanish subjects were analyzed. The results of the PLS-SEM model identified subjective norms and self-congruence as the main predictors of betting intention, whereas goodwill showed limited effects. However, the ANN analysis revealed complex patterns not detected by linear methods, where variables such as goodwill acquire greater relative importance when considering complex interactions between variables. The research contributes theoretically by highlighting the need to adopt conceptual frameworks that consider the complex interaction between psychosocial variables, overcoming traditional models that analyze the determinants of gambling behavior in isolation. Additionally, it provides new knowledge about the differentiated and complementary influence of self-congruence, perceived exposure, goodwill, and involvement in predicting gambling behavior, constructs that had not been systematically integrated into a joint predictive model. Methodologically, it contributes by demonstrating that the integration of SEM and ANN approaches improves the robustness and validity of the analysis, offering a more complete view of the factors that influence the intention to gamble. The findings have practical implications for the design of more effective problem gambling prevention strategies and regulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.