Observational studyBMC women's health2026
Psychological distress and dyadic trust in Italian women awaiting colposcopy after positive cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study.
Observational study in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundScreening programs have substantially reduced cervical cancer incidence and mortality, yet abnormal results can generate considerable psychological distress even before a diagnosis is confirmed. Interpersonal resources such as dyadic trust-the expectation of reliability and support within intimate relationships-may buffer distress, but their role in the colposcopy context is understudied. Examining both individual and relational predictors of emotional well-being may inform targeted psychosocial interventions and improve patient-centered care in cervical cancer screening.
objectivesTo estimate the prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress among Italian women referred for their first colposcopy after a positive cervical cancer screening result, and to identify associated sociodemographic, clinical, and interpersonal factors, with particular focus on dyadic trust. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cross-sectional observational study was conducted from June 2022 to March 2024 at the Lower Genital Tract Clinic of the University of Torino, Italy. Women undergoing their first colposcopy after a positive cytology and/or human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA test within the "Prevenzione Serena" screening program completed three questionnaires at their appointment: a sociodemographic and clinical form, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21), and the Dyadic Trust Scale (DTS). Multivariable logistic regression models assessed associations between participant characteristics and psychological outcomes. Exploratory nomograms were developed to estimate individual risk probabilities; these were not internally validated and should not be used for clinical prediction.
resultsA total of 573 women participated (median age 36 years). Most were single (61%), university-educated (53%), employed (82%), and HPV-unvaccinated (83%). Mild to extremely severe symptoms of stress, depression, and anxiety were reported by 70%, 41%, and 31% of respondents, respectively. In multivariable analysis, higher dyadic trust was associated with lower risk of depression (OR 0.66, 95%CI 0.51-0.85), anxiety (OR 0.53, 95%CI 0.31-0.91) and stress (OR 0.46, 95%CI 0.25-0.85). Lower educational level was associated with higher risk of depression (OR 1.64, 95%CI 1.02-2.64), as HPV vaccination (OR 1.87, 95%CI 1.02-3.41). Younger age was associated with higher risk of anxiety (OR 1.88, 95%CI 1.25-2.86) and stress (OR 4, 95%CI 1.92-8.33) for 16-year increase. Exploratory nomograms allowed individualized risk estimation.
conclusionsPsychological distress-particularly stress-is common among women awaiting colposcopy after a positive screening result. Younger age, lower education, HPV vaccination status, and lower dyadic trust identify those at elevated risk. Integrating risk-stratified psychosocial support, enhancing relational coping, and tailoring communication may improve emotional outcomes. Prospective studies should clarify causal pathways and evaluate partner-inclusive interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.