Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42289673›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular ultrasound2026

Quantification of mitral regurgitation: from traditional methods to artificial intelligence.

Kenneth Cho, Jimmy Su, Odile Bonnefous, Sandeep Prabhu, Chris Anthony

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular ultrasound, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kenneth ChoThe Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Jimmy SuPhilips, Cambridge, USA.
Odile BonnefousPhilips, Cambridge, USA.
Sandeep PrabhuThe Baker Heart and Diabetes Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Chris AnthonyCardiac Diagnostic Services Epworth Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. C.Anthony@alfred.org.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common valvular disorder and associated with adverse outcomes. Echocardiography is the primary imaging modality for MR assessment; however, standard methods rely on geometric assumptions and single-frame analysis, which are especially inaccurate in the setting of eccentric, multiple or non-holosystolic jets. Recent developments in machine learning have enabled automated quantification of MR, which analyse regurgitant flow throughout systole, account for non-hemispheric orifice area and jet morphology, and demonstrate favourable agreement with cardiac magnetic resonance. In addition, AI capable of detecting and grading MR directly from echocardiographic clips offer potential utility for screening, particularly in low-resource settings where specialist review is limited. Quantification of Mitral Regurgitation: from traditional methods to Artificial Intelligence.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEchocardiographyImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMitral ValveMitral Valve InsufficiencyHumans3D Auto CFQArtificial intelligenceDeep learningEchocardiographyMitral regurgitationPISA methodRegurgitant fractionRegurgitant volumeValvular heart diseaseValvular regurgitation

Identifiers

PMID42289673
PMCPMC13267601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.