ArticleBMC medical education2026
The development of a consensus-based curriculum for a Bespoke Online Neonatal Education for Transfers (BONNETs) course.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh neonatal mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is driven by multiple systemic barriers, including insufficient neonatal transport infrastructure and limited provider training. Although specially trained neonatal retrieval teams are recommended for interfacility neonatal transfers, resource constraints lead to non-specialist emergency medical services (EMS) cadres performing these roles, potentially compromising the safe transport of critically ill neonates.
objectiveTo develop a bespoke, online neonatal interfacility transfer curriculum, informed by expert consensus and South African research to address critical gaps in provider knowledge and confidence, thereby improving neonatal transfer outcomes.
methodsBuilding on Kern's Six-Step Framework for curriculum development, an initial curriculum was derived through a comprehensive literature review, a retrospective chart analysis of neonatal cases in South Africa, and detailed interviews with experts and learners. Consequently, consensus on this curriculum was sought using a virtual, modified Nominal Group Technique (NGT) over two consensus rounds. A refined course curriculum is proposed.
resultsFourteen expert participants (neonatologists, paediatricians, neonatal nurses, and Advanced Life Support (ALS) providers with ≥ 3 years of experience) allocated potential outcomes to Core, Extended, or Advanced tiers based on EMS scope of practice. A 75% consensus threshold was applied. Eleven experts completed both rounds (21% attrition). Most were ALS providers (43%), largely employed in the public sector (71%). The final curriculum consists of three sequential courses (Core, Extended, Advanced) which scaffolds learning. The Core course consists of five modules, with each curriculum item achieving > 90% agreement on foundational skills including basic assessment, recognition of critical instability, and escalation pathways. This open-access online course is tailored to resource-limited settings.
conclusionA consensus-driven neonatal interfacility transfer curriculum for South Africa was successfully developed, providing a tiered, evidence-based approach to reinforce provider knowledge and confidence. By leveraging expanding internet accessibility, the Bespoke Online NeoNatal Education for Transfers (BONNETs) framework mitigates geographic disparities while integrating best practices for safe neonatal transfer. However, rigorous validation across diverse contexts and attention to broader systemic challenges, is essential to achieving sustained improvements. Future research should assess the curriculum's performance in improving knowledge and confidence, as well as long-term clinical impact on neonatal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.