ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Longitudinal Symptom Recovery After Pancreatectomy: A Prospective Patient-Reported Outcomes Study using MDASI.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ASO Author Reflections: Defining Patient-Reported Symptom Recovery After Pancreatectomy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDetailed longitudinal data on symptom recovery after pancreatectomy and determinants of delayed recovery remain limited. This study prospectively characterized symptom trajectories and defined symptom-based recovery using patient-reported outcomes.
methodsThe study included 185 patients who underwent pancreatectomy between October 2020 and September 2025 (pancreatoduodenectomy [n = 106], distal pancreatectomy [n = 79]). Of the 185 patients, 121 (65%) underwent a robotic approach. The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) was completed preoperatively at seven postoperative time points through postoperative month (POM) 6. The top five symptoms and top three interference items were identified using mean postoperative day 3 scores. Composite symptom and interference scores were defined as the mean scores of those top items for each. Recovery was defined when both composite scores achieved ≤ 3 of 10 points. Cumulative recovery rates were compared by surgery type and approach, and cluster analysis was performed to identify patients with delayed recovery and contributing factors.
resultsThe top symptoms were pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, drowsiness, and bloating, and the top interference items were general activity, working, and walking. Symptom recovery followed three phases: acute improvement (POD 3 to 14), a plateau (POD 14 to POM 1), and persistent recovery extending to POM 6. Fatigue persisted longest. Overall cumulative recovery rates were 68.1% on POM 1, 78.6% on POM 3, and 86.9% on POM 6. In cluster analysis, postoperative complications predicted delayed recovery, whereas surgery type and approach did not.
conclusionsEarly symptom burden improved over time, with changes varying by time point, but fatigue often persisted. Prevention of postoperative complications appears to be a key strategy for improving symptom recovery regardless of surgical approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42289638What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.