ArticleHeart and vessels2026
Preferences for advance care planning in patients with acute coronary syndrome across precursor and symptomatic heart failure stages.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early implementation of advance care planning (ACP) is recommended in heart failure (HF) in accordance with patients' preferences. However, preferences regarding ACP among patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS)-a spectrum encompassing precursor and symptomatic HF-remain unclear. We aimed to clarify patients' preferences regarding ACP and actual engagement in ACP and prognostic communication with physicians in ACS and identify factors associated with ACP preferences. This cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study enrolled patients with ACS who underwent cardiac rehabilitation at a university-based hospital. The questionnaire assessed preferences for ACP and information disclosure by physicians, HF understanding, and depressive symptoms. Univariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with positive preferences for ACP. Overall, 277 patients (median age: 69 years; men: 80.5%; 78.3% with precursor HF and 21.7% with symptomatic HF) were enrolled. Of them, 77.3% expressed a preference for ACP conversations, whereas only 27.1% participated in them. Regarding prognostic communication, 59.9% desired more information; 25.5% reported that such discussions occurred less frequently than preferred. Positive preferences for ACP were associated with lower depression symptoms, better understanding of HF's impact on life expectancy, higher frequency of prognostic communication, and a desire for more prognostic information but not with the presence of symptomatic HF or age. Most patients with ACS expressed positive preferences for ACP conversations and prognostic communication; however, a substantial gap persists between preferences and practice. Strategies to promote ACP implementation among patients with positive preferences, irrespective of age or HF stage, are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42289597What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.