ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2026
Novel UHMWPE sleeve for stabilizing loose suture anchors in rotator cuff repair.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Suture anchors are frequently used for repairing torn rotator cuffs. However, post-operative anchor loosening is a common complication often caused by low bone density. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if a novel UHMWPE cortex locking sleeve could improve the anchor pullout strength after revision in synthetic bone. The initial failed anchor fixation was simulated by inserting a 4.5 mm anchor and pulling it out of the bone, which created an enlarged insertion hole for the revision anchor. After revision, two loosening conditions were simulated; (i) intra-operative anchor loosening where the revision anchor was directly pulled out from the block after insertion, and (ii) post-operative anchor loosening where the revision anchor was first subjected to cyclic loading and then pulled out. For both loosening conditions, the pullout strength and energy absorbed was recorded for the following configurations: (i) Group A, same-diameter anchor (SDA; 4.5 mm × 10 mm); (ii) Group B, larger-diameter anchor (LDA; 5.5 mm × 10 mm; ); and (iii) Group C, same-diameter anchor combined with the novel sleeve (SDA + NS). For intra-operative anchor loosening, the highest pullout strength was recorded in the SDA + NS group, with a mean value of 370.077 ± 32.699 N, which was significantly greater than both SDA and LDA groups (p < 0.05). Similarly with post-operative anchor loosening, the SDAP + NS group had a significantly higher pullout strength (311.114 ± 28.239 N) than the other groups. Using the UHMWPE sleeve with same diameter anchor as the initial insertion produced a significantly greater pullout strength than the revision with a larger diameter anchor but no sleeve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.