ArticleScientific reports2026
Clinician perspectives on preclinical radiology education: a qualitative study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While there is increasing relevance of diagnostic and interventional radiology in clinical practice, there is insufficient focus on radiology education in preclinical years of the medical course. There is also a prevailing consensus amongst clinicians that the students are not sufficiently prepared for interpretation of radiological images in the clinics. While it is advocated that basic imaging topics should be included in preclinical learning, it is wise to hear what and how much to include from practicing clinicians who directly understand the demand for this knowledge. The objective of this qualitative study is to explore such clinicians' perspectives to build the foundation for an effective preclinical radiology education. Radiologists and non-radiology clinical consultants were interviewed on a one-to-one basis, focusing on their own preclinical learning experiences and foundational knowledge in radiology, pedagogical approaches, associated challenges, and thereby reflecting on future directions to build strong radiology foundation in preclinical years. The interview transcripts were analyzed with a ground-theory approach. Inductive thematic analysis was conducted linking common themes and subthemes. Inductive thematic analysis of the interview data from nine participants yielded five main themes. Results confirmed that radiology bolsters anatomical visualization suggesting a greater grasp of radiological knowledge is mandatory before transitioning to clinical practice. It was advised to develop interactive pedagogical approaches and self-directed learning to learn, to overcome the time limitation prevailing in the preclinical years. A focus should be placed on developing the fundamental understanding of radiology and its modalities yet ensuring the development of critical clinical reasoning ability. Active engagement via small group teaching and clinical content can foster long-lasting connections that will build a solid foundation for future clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.