Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42289574›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Digital twin-driven multiscale modelling for real-time defect prediction in metal additive manufacturing.

Rami Alfattani, Majed M Hotami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rami AlfattaniDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah City, 24224, Saudi Arabia. Rafattni@uqu.edu.sa.
Majed M HotamiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah City, 24224, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a multiscale modelling system based on a digital twin that can predict defects in metal additive manufacturing in real time, with primary validation scoped to Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF). While the framework is architected to generalise across powder-bed and directed-energy deposition (DED) processes, all experimental evaluations are conducted on LPBF using the publicly available NIST AM-Bench benchmark dataset of IN625 and Ti-6Al-4 V specimens. It combines microscale melt pool dynamics with mesoscale thermal fields and macroscale structural deformation via hierarchical physics-informed neural network (PINN) surrogates, with a real-time Internet of Things (IoT) backbone of sensors. It has a three-tier architecture of edge, fog, and cloud, with inference distributed across latency-sensitive edge nodes, fog-level surrogate aggregation, and cloud-based digital twin calibration. Thermal imaging, acoustic emission, and optical monitoring provide sensor-based feedback to the numerical model, which can be used to adaptively control the process in real time during Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) and directed energy deposition (DED). The hybrid Convolutional Neural Network-Long Short-Term Memory (CNN-LSTM) is an extractor of spatio-temporal defect signatures used to classify six defect classification categories, including porosity, lack-of-fusion, cracking, balling, keyholing, and delamination, with a macro-averaged F1-score of 0.9841. Formation of the multiscale coupling, Bayesian calibration and surrogate training formalised in twenty-five governing equations. It was experimentally verified on the publicly available NIST AM-Bench dataset that the proposed DT-MSM structure achieves a mean defect-detection rate of 98.72% and an inference latency of 11.3ms per frame on edge hardware, outperforming seven other baselines. The framework achieves reductions in scrap rate (34.6 per cent) and predictive maintenance lead time (41.2 per cent) in a simulated LPBF production scenario, with improved predictive ability for porosity and cracking compared with offline simulations. Mean plus standard deviation of the results is reported across five random seeds, over which the statistical significance is verified using a paired t-test (p < 0.01). The proposed methodology supports smart manufacturing and quality control in the new-generation production systems for metal additive manufacturing.

Indexed as

CNN-LSTMDigital twinEdge computingIoTLaser powder bed fusionMetal additive manufacturingMultiscale modellingPhysics-informed neural networkReal-time defect prediction

Identifiers

PMID42289574
PMCPMC13527082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.