Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42289570›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Petale

Bruno Maetz, Pierre Fayoux, Christophe Vincent, Philippine Toulemonde, Alexandre Caze

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Comment on "PetaleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bruno MaetzRamsay Santé, Clinique Saint-Amé, Lambres-Lez-Douai, France. brunomaetz@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2652-0880
Pierre FayouxPediatric ENT Department, CHU University Hospital, Lille, France.
Christophe VincentOtology and Otoneurology Department, CHU University Hospital, Lille, France.
Philippine ToulemondeOtology and Otoneurology Department, CHU University Hospital, Lille, France.
Alexandre CazeRamsay Santé, Clinique Saint-Amé, Lambres-Lez-Douai, France.

Funding

Ramsay Santé Ramsay Santé
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesScreening for hearing impairments is part of the mandatory medical visits for infants at nine months and two years in France, however adherence to guidelines is low, diagnostic methods are varied and accuracy is undocumented. The aim of this research was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Petale

methodsIn this prospective diagnostic accuracy study, infants in France aged nine months to three years were tested with Petale

resultsOverall, 157 infants were included in the analysis population and 119 had both an index test and a reference test. Median age was 1.5 years (IQR 1.0;2.0). A hearing impairment was identified with Petale

conclusionsThe diagnostic accuracy of Petale

Indexed as

Hearing LossHearing TestsAuditory AcuityChild, PreschoolFemaleFranceHumansInfantMaleMass ScreeningPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAudiology screeningHearing impairmentInfants

Identifiers

PMID42289570
PMCPMC13407435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.