Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42289566›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Factors influencing outcomes in endoscopic management of post intubation tracheal stenosis with montgomery t tube placement.

Siddharth Manoj, Vidhu Sharma, Rishabh Mehta, Nidhin Das K, Rashmi Hansdah, Kapil Soni, Bikram Choudhury, Amit Goyal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Siddharth ManojDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4349-792X
Vidhu SharmaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India. vidhusharma88@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3547-2329
Rishabh MehtaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7499-594X
Nidhin Das KDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bilaspur, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7109-8477
Rashmi HansdahDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.
Kapil SoniDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.
Bikram ChoudhuryDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1548-8902
Amit GoyalDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPost-intubation tracheal stenosis (PITS) is a common late complication of prolonged endotracheal intubation or tracheostomy, leading to progressive airway obstruction. Endoscopic management with Montgomery T-tube placement provides a less invasive alternative to tracheal resection. This study evaluates clinical factors influencing outcomes following endoscopic treatment with T-tube stenting. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients with PITS managed at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, AIIMS Jodhpur, between January 2019 and December 2023. Patients undergoing endoscopic management followed by Montgomery T-tube insertion, and completing at least 6 months postdecannulation follow-up, were included. Pre-operative assessment included Fibreoptic Laryngoscopy, CT imaging, and voice evaluation (VHI-10 and VRQOL). Outcome measures included need for repeated interventions, successful decannulation, and voice improvement.

resultsOf 27 patients who underwent T-tube placement, 18 met the inclusion criteria of complete follow-up, 17 achieved successful decannulation and formed the final study cohort. Nine of these (52%) required repeated procedures. Significant predictors for repeated interventions were length of stenosis (p < 0.001) and percentage of stenosis (p = 0.01). ROC analysis showed high predictive ability for stenosis length (AUC 0.889) and percentage (AUC 0.819), with cut-off values of >17 mm and >72.5% respectively. Voice outcomes significantly improved at 6 months postdecannulation (p < 0.001).

conclusionEndoscopic management with Montgomery T-tube provides effective airway restoration and voice improvement in PITS. Stenosis length and severity are key predictors of the need for repeat interventions. Proper patient counselling, compliance, and careful consideration are essential for favourable outcomes.

Indexed as

EndoscopyIntubation, IntratrachealLaryngoscopyStentsTracheal StenosisAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTracheostomy DecannulationTreatment OutcomeMontgomery t tubePITSPost intubation tracheal stenosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.