ArticleScientific reports2026
Designing a secure anonymous group-oriented key agreement protocol for the internet of medical things.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Telemonitoring in the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) requires secure and efficient authentication and key agreement protocols to ensure timely access to sensitive resources-such as patients' medical records-by authorized groups of physicians. Recently, Chen and Lee proposed an anonymous, group-oriented, time-bound key agreement protocol based on extended chaotic maps, claiming to achieve a high level of security. In this article, we are the first, to the best of our knowledge, to rigorously examine the actual security of this scheme by revealing critical vulnerabilities affecting seven of the eight stated security objectives in its design. Specifically, we demonstrate that the protocol is susceptible to replay, traceability, information disclosure, and impersonation attacks. As a consequence of the impersonation attack, when group members attempt to access a legitimate service provider, an adversary can successfully redirect them to a counterfeit one. Such an attack could have serious implications for patient care, as physicians might receive incorrect medical records purportedly associated with their patients. We implemented the Chen-Lee's protocol on a Raspberry Pi-based testbed and demonstrated several practical attacks, confirming its weaknesses in real-world scenarios. To mitigate these vulnerabilities, we propose modifications that address the identified flaws while preserving the overall structure of the original protocol. The communications and computation overhead of the proposed protocol is approximately 4% higher than that of the Chen-Lee protocol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.