ArticleScientific reports2026
Quality retention and energy optimization in ohmic vacuum concentration of white mulberry syrup.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study systematically compared hybrid ohmic-vacuum heating technology with conventional ohmic heating at atmospheric pressure (100 kPa, used as the control treatment) for white mulberry syrup concentration. The experimental design consisted of two operational modes: (a) conventional ohmic heating at atmospheric pressure (100 kPa, baseline control), and (b) hybrid ohmic-vacuum heating at reduced pressures (50 and 75 kPa). Each mode was evaluated at three voltage gradients (10, 20, and 30 V/cm). Multi-objective optimization was performed using NSGA-II to simultaneously maximize bioactive compounds while minimizing processing time and energy consumption. Results demonstrated that increasing voltage gradient from 10 to 30 V/cm reduced processing time by 75.3% in the control (atmospheric pressure), whereas under ohmic-vacuum conditions (50 and 75 kPa), processing times were 81-295% longer than the control treatment due to reduced electrical conductivity at lower temperatures. Total phenolic content decreased by 28-48% across all treatments, with best retention (33.1 mg GAE/100 mL) achieved at 50 kPa and 10 V/cm. Antioxidant capacity showed excellent preservation (62.13-86.12%), peaking at 86.12% under intermediate conditions (75 kPa, 20 V/cm). Total flavonoid content exhibited dramatic variability (60.22-171.20 mg CE/100 mL), with maximum retention at 50 kPa and 10 V/cm. Counterintuitively, the control treatment demonstrated superior energy efficiency, with specific energy consumption 2.5-3.7-fold lower than the hybrid ohmic-vacuum method. NSGA-II optimization identified the best compromise conditions at 83.47 kPa and 26.82 V/cm, yielding: TPC = 30.85 mg GAE/100 mL, DPPH = 84.73%, TFC = 78.14 mg CE/100 mL, processing time = 12.24 min, and SEC = 2.87 MJ/kg water evp.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.