ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation of composites interphase mechanical properties considering CZM and FGM behaviors using single-fiber composite tensile tests.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mechanical behavior of the matrix-fiber interphase plays a critical role in the performance of composite materials, as damage often initiates and propagates from this region. This study combines experimental and numerical approaches to investigate the interphase mechanical properties between glass fibers and epoxy matrix using specially designed single-fiber composite specimens. Tensile tests are performed at a low loading rate, and the obtained elastic responses are matched to those calculated from finite element analyses (FEA) of three-phase models by varying the interphase mechanical properties. Two modeling strategies were applied: (1) a functionally graded material (FGM) approach, in which Young's modulus varies across the interphase thickness, and (2) a cohesive zone model (CZM) representing the fiber-matrix interphase. The CZM parameters were calibrated to match the experimental elastic modulus. Results show that the cohesive zone model better reproduces the experimental elastic response than the FGM approach. This improvement is attributed to the CZM's capability to capture interphase softening near the composite's failure surface, effectively representing interphase damage initiated prior to the final failure of the fiber and matrix.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.