Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42289459›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Breast cancer risk genes affecting individual radiosensitivity.

Ramona K G Vogel, Niklas Amann, Tara Zuhair Kassem, Paul Gaß, Theresa Mayo, Felix Woltereck, Carolin C Hack, Rainer Fietkau, Stefanie Corradini, Luitpold Distel and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ramona K G VogelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsstraße 27, D-91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Niklas AmannDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsstraße 21/23, D-91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Tara Zuhair KassemDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsstraße 27, D-91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Paul GaßDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsstraße 21/23, D-91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Theresa MayoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München (TUM), Ismaninger Str. 22, D-81675, Munich, Germany.
Felix WoltereckDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsstraße 27, D-91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Carolin C HackDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsstraße 21/23, D-91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Rainer FietkauDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsstraße 27, D-91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Stefanie CorradiniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsstraße 27, D-91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Luitpold DistelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsstraße 27, D-91054, Erlangen, Germany. luitpold.distel@uk-erlangen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8040-3226
Lukas C F KuhlmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsstraße 27, D-91054, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased radiosensitivity can cause adverse radiotherapy effects. Heterozygote variants in breast cancer risk genes increase cancer risk and may affect radiosensitivity. This study assessed their impact on individual radiosensitivity to determine the radiation risk for gene carriers. Radiosensitivity was analyzed in 273 patients with breast cancer risk gene variants. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FiSH), chromosomal aberrations were quantified as breaks per metaphase (B/M) after ex vivo irradiation of blood lymphocytes. Results were compared with healthy controls and breast cancer cases, both without confirmed non-carrier status, limiting gene-specific conclusions. Gene carriers showed slightly increased radiosensitivity (mean 0.488 B/M ± 0.134) compared with healthy controls (0.411 B/M ± 0.088; p < 0.0001) but similar to breast cancer control group (0.498 B/M ± 0.192; p = 0.563). In BRCA1/2 carriers, radiosensitivity was slightly increased, while single cases in BARD1, RAD51, and MSH variants suggested a possible increase (p < 0.003). Radiosensitivity was influenced by gene locus, variant type, age, and cancer history. 24.5% of carriers exceeded a cutoff of ≥ 0.55 B/M, where dose reduction could be considered. Radiosensitivity of breast cancer risk gene carriers varies and is slightly increased. Individuals with increased radiosensitivity risk should consider testing.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseRadiation ToleranceAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesChromosome AberrationsFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMiddle AgedRisk FactorsBRCA1BRCA2Breast cancer risk genesChromosomal aberrationsFluorescence in situ hybridizationRadiosensitivity

Identifiers

PMID42289459
PMCPMC13265738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.