ArticleScientific reports2026
Diagnostic efficacy of circulating tumor cell in clinically significant prostate cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate the value of circulating tumor cells (CTC) in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Patients who underwent prostate biopsy under ultrasound guidance and CTC detection at Nantong University Affiliated Hospital from December 2023 to June 2024 were included. Based on the CTC detection results, patients were divided into CTC-positive and negative groups. The baseline information and biopsy pathological results were collected and analyzed. The detection rate of csPCa was compared between two groups. Univariate and multivariate analysis were conducted to explore the independent predictors of csPCa. The diagnostic efficacy was evaluated by ROC curve analysis. 90 patients were enrolled, of whom 46 patients were CTC-positive. 52 patients were diagnosed with csPCa. Patients in the CTC-positive group had higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (p = 0.001), larger prostate volumes (p = 0.007), higher Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score (p < 0.001), later clinical stages (p < 0.001), higher biopsy Gleason score (p < 0.001), and higher detection rate of csPCa (p = 0.003). In the univariate analysis, PSA, prostate volume, PI-RADS score, and CTC count were associated with csPCa. In the multivariate analysis, PSA (p = 0.046), PI-RADS score (p = 0.001), and CTC count (p = 0.034) were independent predictors of csPCa. In the Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the combination of CTC count, PSA, and PI-RADS scores had the largest area under the curve (AUC = 0.913). CTC count is an independent predictor of csPCa. The combination of PSA, PI-RADS score and CTC count is expected to enhance the diagnosis of csPCa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.