Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42289422›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Principled XAI analysis of the deep learning-based landslide susceptibility prediction model.

Jongchan Oh, Jung-Hyun Lee, Hyuck-Jin Park, Daeung Yoon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jongchan OhDepartment of Energy Resources Engineering, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 61186, Republic of Korea.
Jung-Hyun LeeDepartment of Geoinformation Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul, 05006, Republic of Korea.
Hyuck-Jin ParkDepartment of Geoinformation Engineering, Sejong University, Seoul, 05006, Republic of Korea.
Daeung YoonDepartment of Energy Resources Engineering, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 61186, Republic of Korea. duyoon@jnu.ac.kr.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea RS-2023-00222563
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on applying machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques to landslide susceptibility analysis is widespread, with increasingly accurate analyses through novel models. Predicting landslide susceptibility using ML models involves analyzing relationships between conditioning factors and landslide occurrences. Unlike traditional methods, ML models do not explicitly incorporate geotechnical or hydrological theories, raising concerns about result reliability despite high accuracy. This "black-box" limitation has prompted research applying eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) algorithms to interpret relationships between conditioning factors (digital elevation models (DEM), forest characteristics, soil properties, and geological features) and landslide susceptibility, thereby validating proposed ML models. In this paper, landslide susceptibility prediction models were developed using 20 conditioning factors and multiple architectures, including Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). Quantitative performances and XAI outcomes were compared. Specifically, the quantitative evaluation showed that the traditional point-based models (RF, SVM, and MLP) achieved Accuracies of 0.6931, 0.6621, and 0.7034, respectively, while the image-based CNNs achieved a higher Accuracy of 0.7586. Furthermore, regarding Recall-a critical metric for disaster management to minimize false negatives-the CNNs (0.8138) significantly outperformed the RF (0.6345), SVM (0.6276), and MLP (0.6828). These results underscore that capturing spatial context through image-wise inputs is far more effective for landslide susceptibility mapping than conventional pixel-level analysis. Because CNNs process input data differently, Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) was applied alongside SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for CNNs, whereas only SHAP was applied to the other models. Results indicated specific patterns associated with certain conditioning factors in landslide susceptibility prediction. CNNs' Grad-CAM heatmap effectively illustrated these patterns by treating data as images, improving interpretability and reliability of ML outputs.

Indexed as

Convolutional neural networksDeep learningeXplainable Artificial IntelligenceLandslide susceptibility analysisMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID42289422
PMCPMC13526792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.