ArticleScientific reports2026
Automated measurement of left ventricular ejection time via contactless suprasternal notch laser vibrometry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Left Ventricular Ejection Time (LVET) is a sensitive indicator of early cardiac dysfunction, yet its routine use in first-line population screening is hindered by the operational and time demands of operator-dependent modalities like echocardiography. In this study, we introduce a scalable, contactless approach using laser Doppler vibrometry (LDV) signals targeted at the suprasternal notch (SSN) to capture hemodynamic events without physical sensor attachment. We demonstrate in a cohort of 238 individuals that this rapid, zero-setup measurement yields LVET values statistically equivalent to pulsed-wave Doppler echocardiography (concordance within a 25 ms margin). Furthermore, an exploratory clinical analysis revealed that the LDV-derived LVET index (LVETI) was significantly prolonged in patients with aortic insufficiency and stenosis compared to low-risk controls, demonstrating the clinical plausibility of the measurement. To eliminate the bottleneck of expert interpretation, we developed and validated a deep learning model that automatically extracts LVET with high accuracy (mean absolute error of 8.08 ms). By combining easy LDV data acquisition with automated analysis, this approach may facilitate rapid, operator-independent cardiovascular assessment, potentially enhancing population-level screening and cardiovascular health management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.