ArticleScientific reports2026
How game score shapes anticipatory swing decisions in baseball players: a functional MRI study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Contextual information influences action anticipation in sport, but how game-score cues shape perceptual processing and neural correlates remains unclear. This study used functional MRI to examine behavioral and neural responses to score context in baseball batters of varying skills. Skilled and intermediate batters viewed far-ahead or even score scenarios followed by a pitcher's delivery and predicted whether to swing. A no-score control condition was included. Participants rated perceived stress and confidence after each condition. Score cues did not affect anticipation accuracy in either group, but confidence was higher in far-ahead than even-score conditions. Skilled batters reported lower perceived stress than intermediates in the even-score condition, reflecting more adaptive responses. During score presentation, skilled batters showed lower right superior temporal gyrus activity than intermediates, suggesting more efficient integration of contextual cues. Group-by-score interactions revealed distinct neural patterns: skilled batters engaged left angular gyrus and posterior middle temporal gyrus for even-score information, reflecting semantic and symbolic processing. Conversely, intermediates recruited left middle to posterior cingulate and bilateral middle frontal gyri under far-ahead scores, indicating attentional control. During anticipation, skilled batters showed reduced caudate activity in the even-score condition, reflecting decreased cognitive engagement, while intermediates showed increased dorsal attention network activity in the no-score condition, reflecting compensatory attentional recruitment under uncertainty. These findings demonstrate skill-dependent neural reallocation between score processing and anticipation stages, highlighting how expertise shapes the integration of contextual and kinematic information to guide adaptive anticipatory decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.