Observational studyNeurologia medico-chirurgica2026
Electroencephalogram-based Objective Assessment of Surgical Expertise during Microvascular Anastomosis Training.
Observational study in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroencephalogram-based objective assessment of surgical skill remains underexplored in neurosurgical training. We investigated whether electroencephalogram spectral features can discriminate surgical expertise during microvascular anastomosis training and identify neural markers associated with task performance. We conducted a prospective observational study in 29 right-handed male participants (neurosurgeons, residents, and medical students) performing a 10-minute interrupted anastomosis on a 1.0-mm hydrophilic tube under an operating microscope. Electroencephalogram under the 10-20 system was recorded during the task, segmented into 3 procedural phases (needle insertion, knot tying, thread cutting), and epoched into 2-second windows. Participants were stratified post hoc into Skilled (≥6 units) and Less-skilled (≤5 units) groups based on task throughput. Power spectral density from 4 to 22 Hz was summarized into 6 frequency bands across 7 regions of interest, yielding 42 features per epoch. Classification models were trained using a nested cross-validation framework with a leave-one-subject-out outer loop, and epoch-level predictions of Skilled-class probability were aggregated into subject-level scores, from which phase-specific area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values were calculated. A total of 7,201 artifact-free epochs (76.3%) were included. Subject-level discrimination performance varied by phase, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.736 for needle insertion, 0.678 for knot tying, and 0.788 for thread cutting. Feature attribution and group-level analyses consistently revealed increased frontal alpha power and reduced midline theta power in Skilled participants, particularly during needle insertion and thread cutting. These findings support the feasibility of electroencephalogram-based objective assessment of microsurgical expertise and identify candidate neural markers of proficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.