ArticleTrends in hearing
Effects of Talker Sex Differences on Binaural Summation in Cochlear Implant Users and Normal Hearing Listeners.
Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The benefit of binaural summation ("summation") is often measured in co-located steady-state noise; summation for competing speech is less understood. The goal of the present study was to evaluate how the target-masker acoustic properties and binaural listening mode affect summation for speech-in-speech recognition. Recognition of target speech in two-talker speech maskers was measured with each ear alone and with both ears in bilateral CI users (BiCI), CI users with asymmetric hearing loss (AHL), CI users who were single-sided deaf (SSD), and normal-hearing listeners (NH). Target and masker speech was co-located; the talker sex of the maskers was either the same as or different from the target. With same-sex maskers, significant binaural summation was observed only in the BiCI group. In contrast, with different-sex maskers, significant summation was observed only in the SSD and NH groups, where binaural summation was significantly greater with different-sex than with same-sex maskers. A significant but weak correlation between interaural performance asymmetry and binaural summation was observed in some within-group comparisons, but not in across-group comparisons. For the BiCI group, summation was significantly correlated with SRTs from the better-performing CI ear, but not with performance asymmetry. The findings can be partly accounted for by psychometric-function slope and performance asymmetry within a probability-summation model. However, the probability-summation model generally overestimated the observed summation, suggesting that the assumption of independent processing across ears may not hold for CI users, possibly due to the variability in binaural fusion across individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.