ArticleEmergency medicine Australasia : EMA2026
Distribution and Accessibility of Hospital-Based Emergency Departments for Paediatric Patients in Rural and Remote Western Australia: A Geographic Analysis.
Article in Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study examined the distribution of emergency departments relative to remoteness and socioeconomic disadvantage and explored service availability for children in non-metropolitan Western Australia.
methodsWe conducted a spatial analysis using the Australian Government datasets. Child population counts and emergency facility locations were integrated into Quantum Geographic Information System and classified by remoteness using the Modified Monash Model (MMM) and by area-level socioeconomic disadvantage using the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Disadvantage (IRSD). Buffer zones were generated around each facility to quantify the proportion of children residing within specified distance thresholds. Service availability was assessed using facility-to-child and bed-to-child ratios.
resultsEmergency department availability declined with increasing remoteness: MMM5 contained the largest share of facilities (42.6%), followed by MMM6 (31.2%) and MMM7 (26.2%). However, ratios appeared more favourable in very remote areas, with facility-to-child ratios improving from 1:848 (MMM5) to 1:741 (MMM7). Bed availability showed a similar pattern, ranging from 1:83 in MMM5 to 1:60 in MMM7. Socioeconomic analyses revealed a concentration of facilities and bed capacity in the most disadvantaged areas, with IRSD 1 hosting 57.4% of all facilities and 35.8% of total bed capacity.
conclusionGeographic and socioeconomic inequities in emergency care provision persist across rural and remote Western Australia. Apparent improvements in ratios in very remote areas are driven by low population density rather than greater service investment. These findings support a shift to needs-based paediatric emergency service planning, using remoteness and IRSD-stratified proximity and capacity measures to prioritise communities with the greatest access shortfalls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.