ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2026
Real-world outcomes of ipilimumab plus nivolumab in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional large cohort study.
Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCombination immune checkpoint inhibition with ipilimumab plus nivolumab (NIVO + IPI) has shown promising efficacy in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in the CheckMate648 trial. However, real-world evidence regarding its safety, efficacy as first-line therapy, and host-related biomarkers relevant to immunotherapy remains limited.
methodsThis multicenter retrospective study evaluated a large cohort of 111 patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent ESCC who received first-line NIVO + IPI therapy. Treatment response, treatment-related adverse events, and prognostic factors were analyzed.
resultsThe objective response and disease control rates in cases with target lesions were 44.0% and 70.7%, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events ≥ Grade 2 occurred in 58 (52.3%) patients, including one Grade 4 event (type 1 diabetes) and two Grade 5 events (biliary infection and myocarditis). The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were 22 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 13-not reached) and 5 months (95% CI 3-8), respectively. OS was significantly affected by lymph node metastasis in unresectable advanced disease and by liver metastasis in recurrent disease. Multivariate analysis of OS identified the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR), a marker of host immune-inflammatory status, as the only independent prognostic parameter (hazard ratio = 2.99, 95% CI 1.35-6.63, P = 0.0071).
conclusionsIn this large real-world cohort, first-line NIVO + IPI therapy demonstrated meaningful clinical activity and an acceptable safety profile in advanced ESCC. Treatment outcomes varied according to metastatic patterns, suggesting an influence of organ-specific immune microenvironments, and CAR emerged as a simple and robust prognostic biomarker. These findings support the real-world applicability of dual immune checkpoint blockade and highlight the importance of host immune context in patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.