ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2026
Stone tool use in a new population of semi-free-ranging robust capuchins (Sapajus spp.) at Monkeyland Primate Sanctuary, South Africa.
Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Once thought to be uniquely human, tool use is now recognized in a range of non-human animals, with non-human primates frequently using tools in foraging contexts. Stone tool use is a common behavior in different species of capuchin monkeys, with evidence of behavioral and cultural differences across populations. In this study, we document stone tool use during percussive foraging in a previously unstudied population of capuchin monkeys at the Monkeyland Primate Sanctuary, South Africa. Of 87 mapped nut‑cracking sites, 77 yielded behavioral data comprising 1,359 recorded bouts. Capuchins showed a strong preference for organic anvils (roots n = 1,161, trunks n = 173, branches n = 23; with only 2 bouts on stone anvils) and used a wide range of hammer masses (25-1,581 g). Average nut‑cracking success was ~ 75%. Results show that nut-cracking success varies depending on both the capuchins' preferred hand and the size of the hammer they use. Additionally, we found strong individual differences in hand preference, which suggests that Monkeyland capuchins can adapt their techniques to improve their success. Because observations were limited to a subset of identified individuals between May andAugust, sex‑bias results are preliminary and future year‑round sampling is needed. Overall, our study adds to the growing body of research on capuchin cultural diversity by documenting tool use in a previously unstudied semi-free-ranging population. This preliminary assessment demonstrates the value of Monkeyland as a primate archaeology research site that preserves key ecological and social conditions while offering a unique balance between naturalistic behaviors and research accessibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.