ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2026
Mortality prediction using a geriatric vulnerability scale in the emergency department of a private hospital in Mexico City.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Acutely Presenting Older Patient (APOP) screener into Spanish for use among Mexican patients attending the emergency department, in order to predict the risk of 90-day mortality. Patients aged 70 years and older who received emergency care at a private hospital in Mexico City were included. The APOP scale underwent translation, cultural adaptation, and expert validation in accordance with standardized guidelines. For each patient, vulnerability risk was calculated, and a 90-day follow-up was conducted to assess mortality. A total of 317 patients were recruited, and 206 (65%) completed the 90-day follow-up. The culturally adapted Spanish version of the APOP scale was successfully validated by experts. A high-vulnerability score (≥ 46 points) predicted 90-day mortality with a sensitivity of 51.6% and a specificity of 85.1%, with an area under the curve of 0.74 (95% confidence interval: 0.71-0.77). The APOP scale effectively identifies vulnerable older adults in the emergency department. Its high specificity allows clinicians to recognize patients unlikely to require extensive evaluation, improving resource allocation and streamlining care in the time-sensitive emergency setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42289027What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.