ArticleChemical research in toxicology2026
Predicting Aquatic Species Sensitivity Distributions Using Machine Learning in a Regulatory Setting.
Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The assessment of chemical risks is increasingly challenged by insufficient toxicological data available for the large number of marketed substances. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) offer promising avenues to bridge these data gaps through model-based predictions. However, the integration of these methodologies into risk assessment practices remains limited, largely due to issues surrounding (regulatory) trust in the model outcomes. We developed an ML model to predict the ecotoxicity of chemicals across a broad range of aquatic species. These predictions are utilized to construct Species Sensitivity Distributions (SSDs), which constitute a key tool in environmental risk assessment. Trust of risk assessors in the SSDs is essential for use in chemical risk assessment, especially for modeled SSDs. Hence, besides quantitative performance evaluation, we also performed an extensive qualitative validation encompassing aspects such as interpretability and transparency. However, to truly advance the development of ML models for risk assessment, it is crucial to foster interdisciplinary collaboration to enhance the applicability of these technologies within regulatory frameworks. Therefore, this study emphasizes the importance of regulatory acceptance when developing new ML models for SSD predictions. We highlight future opportunities for ML in SSD prediction, while also addressing the challenges of qualitative model validation. As such, this work aims to stimulate the discussion on advancing in silico methodologies beyond the current state of the art and bridging the gap between the technological efforts made in the field of AI and the regulatory needs of chemical risk assessors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.