Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42288959›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2026

'We're the Eyes and Ears… out There': A Qualitative Exploration of the Perceptions and Experiences of Polypharmacy Amongst Home Care Providers.

Anum Iqbal, Liam Mullen, Adam Todd, Barbara Hanratty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. 'We're the Eyes and Ears… out There': A Qualitative Exploration of the Perceptions and Experiences of Polypharmacy Amongst Home Care Providers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anum IqbalSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4616-0179
Liam MullenPharmacy Department, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Adam ToddSchool of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Barbara HanrattyNewcastle Patient Safety Research Collaboration (PSRC), Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3122-7190

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Newcastle Patient Safety Research Collaboration (PSRC) NIHR204291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPolypharmacy is often managed at home by older people and those involved in their day-to-day care. Home care workers are well placed to play a crucial role, but there is little research in this setting. This study aimed to explore experiences and perceptions of polypharmacy amongst providers of home care.

methodsWe conducted qualitative interviews with 15 home care staff from five for-profit home care providers in three regions of England. Data were analysed thematically.

resultsWe identified three overarching themes: (1) managing medications within a fragmented care system, (2) decision-making and autonomy and (3) client and family expectations and emotional burden of home care work. People providing home care services were striving to support older people with medications with limited training, communication or authority. The emotional toll on the home care workers was considerable.

conclusionHome care supports an ageing population to live and be cared for, close to home. There are potential benefits to the management of polypharmacy, of better integrating home care into the broader health and care system. Clarity over roles, appropriate channels of communication and enhanced training are required. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Individuals with lived experience of home care services contributed meaningfully throughout the study. They advised on the development of the topic guide to ensure that interview questions were relevant, acceptable and reflective of real-world home care experiences. At the mid-point of data collection, public contributors reviewed insights and provided feedback on whether additional issues or perspectives should be explored in subsequent interviews. Following completion of data collection, they were also involved in discussing the preliminary findings and ensuring that the interpretation accurately reflected the experiences of those using and or accessing the service.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHome Care ServicesPolypharmacyAgedDecision MakingEnglandFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID42288959
PMCPMC13264679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.