ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2026
Involving patient partners as appraisers of shared decision making: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient and public involvement (PPI) is increasingly recognised as a valuable component of health research, yet patients are rarely included in data analysis within shared decision making (SDM) studies. We aimed to assess the feasibility and value of involving patient partner appraisers of SDM using the OPTION
methodsAn explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was used. Four patient partners and three researchers used the validated Danish version of OPTION
resultsThe four patient partners appraised 25-27 consultations each. Total OPTION
conclusionsInvolving patient partners as appraisers of SDM using OPTION
trial registrationEthical approval was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee at the University of Southern Denmark (approval ID 23/555) for the involvement of patient partners as co-researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.