Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42288927›Full record

ArticleTrials2026

The Scandinavian Displaced Lateral Clavicle trial (ScanDiLaC): a study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

Pontus Christersson, Dennis Karimi, Kirsten Grønhaug, Antti Launonen, Stig Brorson, Frede Frihagen, Bjarke Viberg, Nils Hailer, Olof Wolf

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06981065 (The Scandinavian Displaced Lateral Clavicle Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06981065 narecruitingnot on this map

The Scandinavian Displaced Lateral Clavicle Trial (ScanDiLaC) - A Multicentre, Pragmatic, 12-Month, Non-inferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUppsala UniversityRan2025 to 2029Enrolled96ConditionsClavicle FractureArmsSimple Sling and Physiotherapy, Surgical treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Pontus ChristerssonUppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden. Pontus.christersson@uu.se.
Dennis KarimiTrauma Orthopaedic Research Copenhagen Hvidovre (TORCH), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kirsten GrønhaugSykehuset Østfold, Grålum, Norway.
Antti LaunonenTampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Stig BrorsonZealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
Frede FrihagenSykehuset Østfold, Grålum, Norway.
Bjarke VibergOdense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Nils HailerUppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Olof WolfUppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence regarding the treatment of displaced, extraarticular lateral clavicle fractures is scarce. No study has shown clinically significant differences between surgical and nonsurgical treatment, but the sample sizes have been small, as it has been difficult to include enough patients with this relatively uncommon fracture type. PURPOSE: This study aims to compare outcomes after surgical and nonsurgical treatment for displaced lateral clavicle fractures.

methodsThis is a pragmatic, noninferiority, preference-tolerant, randomized controlled trial (RCT). A total of 100 patients between the ages of 18 and 65 with displaced lateral clavicle fractures will be randomly allocated on a 1:1 ratio to surgical or nonsurgical treatment with the option of early crossover after 6 weeks. An observational cohort will comprise patients not willing to be randomized. This is a multicenter Scandinavian RCT including hospitals in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland. The primary outcome is the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 1 year. Follow-up points will be 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. The secondary outcomes are the DASH score, the EQ-5D-5L score, the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, the Nottingham Clavicle Score (NCS), a visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and anchor questions in the form of the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) collected at all timepoints during the study. All complications, radiographic healing, and return to work will be reported. DISCUSSION: The optimal treatment for displaced Neer type II and V lateral clavicle fractures remains a topic of debate. This RCT may provide a better understanding of the differences in outcomes of nonsurgical and surgical treatment while reflecting real-world clinical practice and guiding the development of a treatment algorithm for the orthopedic community.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06981065. Registered on 19 May 2025. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06981065?term=Scandilac&rank=1.

Indexed as

ClavicleFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, BoneAdolescentAdultAgedDisability EvaluationEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleFracture HealingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionDistal clavicle fractureLateral clavicle fractureNonsurgicalPatient-reported outcomesRandomized controlled trialSurgical fixation

Identifiers

PMID42288927
PMCPMC13263930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.