Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42288919›Full record

Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2026

Proteomic blood-based biomarkers of brain damage in traumatic brain injury: are they suitable surrogate endpoints for cerebral pressure autoregulatory-guided therapy?

Rozerin Kevci, Anders Hånell, Marcel Aries, Cecilia Åkerlund, Andras Buki, Shubhayu Bhattacharyay, Guido Di Tommaso, Rik Hendrix, Virginia Newcombe, Anders Lewén and 5 more

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Rozerin KevciDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Neurosurgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. rozerin.kevci@uu.se.
Anders HånellDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Neurosurgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Marcel AriesDepartment of Intensive Care, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Cecilia ÅkerlundDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Section for Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Andras BukiFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Shubhayu BhattacharyayHarvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Guido Di TommasoDepartment of Neurointensive Care Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Rik HendrixDepartment of Intensive Care, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Virginia NewcombeDepartment of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Anders LewénDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Neurosurgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Per EnbladDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Neurosurgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Erta BeqiriBrain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Peter SmielewskiBrain Physics Laboratory, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Teodor Svedung WettervikDepartment of Medical Sciences, Section of Neurosurgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
HR subgroup CENTER-TBI collaborators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) aims to prevent secondary injury by optimizing cerebral physiology, yet conventional metrics such as intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) incompletely capture the underlying pathophysiology. Impaired cerebral pressure autoregulation (CPA) is common and may exacerbate secondary injury. Proteomic blood-based biomarkers (PBBMs) of astrocytic (glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP], S100 calcium-binding protein B [S100B]), and neuronal/axonal injury (total tubulin associated unit [t-Tau], neurofilament light chain [NfL], ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 [UCH-L1], neuron-specific enolase [NSE]) may provide global indicators of secondary injury. This study investigated temporal associations between PBBMs and cerebral physiological variables (ICP, CPP, pressure reactivity index [PRx], and CPP deviation from "optimal" CPP [ΔCPPopt]), and evaluated the PBBMs as surrogate short-term endpoints.

methodsThis retrospective, observational multi-center study, used prospective data from the CENTER-TBI cohort and included 151 patients with high-frequency cerebral physiological data and serial PBBM measurements during the first seven days post-injury. Associations were analyzed using Spearman correlations, univariate and multivariate linear mixed effects models (LMEMs), as well as cross correlation analyses adjusted for repeated measures and clinical confounders.

resultsElevated PBBM levels on day 1 were associated with a greater cumulative burden of high ICP, impaired CPA (positive PRx), and negative ΔCPPopt over the subsequent seven days. Throughout the monitoring period, higher median PBBM concentrations correlated with elevated ICP and impaired CPA, with strongest associations when cerebral physiological monitoring and PBBMs were analyzed from the same day. In multivariate LMEMs, elevated ICP and most PBBMs remained significantly associated, while particularly PRx amplified this association.

conclusionsCerebral physiological disturbances during intensive care after TBI were associated with elevated PBBM levels, with ICP showing the strongest influence and impaired CPA amplifying some PBBM responses. Associations were strongest in same-day analyses and appeared bidirectional. These findings suggest that PBBM may reflect the burden of secondary cerebral insults and may serve as candidate endpoints for future trials targeting cerebral physiology, pending validation in prospective high-resolution studies. Importantly, our results highlight the potential for PBBMs to complement multimodal neuromonitoring by tracking secondary injury trajectories.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBrain Injuries, TraumaticProteomicsAdultCerebrovascular CirculationFemaleGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinHomeostasisHumansIntracranial PressureMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinBiomarkersCerebral autoregulationCerebral pressure autoregulationIntensive careIntracranial pressurePressure reactivity indexTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID42288919
PMCPMC13267589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.