ArticleBMC psychology2026
Identifying predictive factors of cyberbullying perpetration via deep learning: a two-stage training approach to class imbalance with weighted loss.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough machine learning has been widely used to investigate problematic behaviors such as cyberbullying, class imbalance in behavioral datasets remains a persistent challenge. This study, based on the General Aggression Model and the Social-Ecological Framework, aims to improve the identification of cyberbullying perpetrators through a deep learning framework that combines a two-stage training strategy with a class-weighted loss function.
methodsA total of 660 Chinese university students (including 54 self-reported perpetrators) were recruited from schools.
resultsThe deep learning model achieved a recall of 0.92, significantly outperforming conventional methods such as LightGBM and Random Forest which showed low recall for the minority class. SHAP analysis revealed that screen time, negative emotions, school connectedness, online disinhibition, exposure to violent media and deviant peer affiliation were the most influential predictors. Interaction analyses revealed that school connectedness may buffer the impact of multiple risk factors.
conclusionsThe framework effectively addresses extreme class imbalance for cyberbullying detection, offering both strong performance and interpretable insights for prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.