ArticleBMC health services research2026
Cost savings of task-sharing in family planning: estimates across 128 low- and middle-income countries.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTask-sharing, the expansion of health service provision to a broader range of health workers, where the number of providers is expanded through training and support of additional cadres, offers a strategy to alleviate some of the human resource and financial challenges that limit low- and middle-income countries' (LMICs) ability to deliver essential health services, including family planning (FP). In this study, we apply the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommendations to estimate the potential cost-savings from task-sharing FP services.
methodsWe use the Adding It Up (AIU) 2024 model estimates on contraceptive services for 128 LMICs to estimate the direct costs of providing contraceptive care for six methods - condoms (male and female), oral contraceptive pills, emergency contraceptive pills (ECP), injectables, implants and intrauterine devices. We compare the costs of two scenarios - a status quo (under current provider guidelines for FP service delivery) and a task-sharing scenario (implementing WHO task-sharing guidelines for FP service delivery).
resultsImplementing WHO task-sharing recommendations within the next year would save an estimated $1.6 billion USD across all LMICs. Task-sharing reduces the direct cost of service delivery for all six methods, saving 34% for male condoms, 31% for injectables, 30% for pills and IUDs, 22% for ECPs, 12% for implants and 9% for female condoms. These cost savings were largely consistent at the global, regional, and sub-regional levels.
conclusionsWHO recommendations for task-sharing service delivery offer a critical cost-saving policy mechanism that leverages limited human and financial resources to better meet contraceptive needs while at the same time reducing health system costs. Cost estimates generated from the AIU model show that implementing WHO recommendations for task-sharing family planning services is a promising strategy for expanding access to contraceptive care across LMICs. Amidst increasing cuts to family planning financing, strategies for delivering quality services at lower costs are critical to ensuring continued access to care.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.