Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42288865›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2026

Associations of critical thinking and social media addiction with eHealth literacy among adolescent social media users.

İlknur Dolu, Ecem Çiçek, Mahir Can Gökçe, Hilal Büyüktopaç Çakıcı, Feyza Demir Bozkurt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

İlknur DoluDepartment of Basic Sciences, İstanbul Nişantaşı University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Ecem ÇiçekDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Bartın University, Bartın, Türkiye. egumus@bartin.edu.tr.
Mahir Can GökçeMinistry of National Education of the Republic of Türkiye, Bartın Provincial Directorate of National Education, Koksal Toptan High School, Bartın, Türkiye.
Hilal Büyüktopaç ÇakıcıDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Bartın University, Bartın, Türkiye.
Feyza Demir BozkurtDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Bartın University, Bartın, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aims to investigate the impact of social media addiction and critical thinking on eHealth literacy in adolescents. The cross-sectional study was conducted between March and July 2025 among high school students. A census sampling method was employed, with 80.2% of students agreeing to participate. Data were collected using a questionnaire comprising socio-demographic information, the eHealth Literacy Scale for Adolescents, the Critical Thinking in Everyday Life Questionnaire, and the Social Media Addiction Scale for Adolescents. Of the participants, 62.8% were female, and the most commonly used social media platforms were Instagram (85.5%). The study found a positive and strong correlation between eHealth literacy and critical thinking in everyday life, whereas no significant relationship was found between eHealth literacy and social media addiction. According to the linear regression analysis, daily internet use (hours) and critical thinking in everyday life were significantly associated with eHealth literacy. This study highlights that eHealth literacy in adolescents is significantly influenced by daily internet usage and critical thinking skills, rather than social media addiction. These findings suggest that future interventions should prioritize the development of critical thinking to empower adolescents as informed health users.

Indexed as

Critical thinking; AdolescenteHealth literacySchool nurseSocial media addiction

Identifiers

PMID42288865
PMCPMC13589339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.