ArticleBMC women's health2026
A womb with rheum: providers' knowledge and educational needs in caring for women with rheumatic diseases.
Article in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus on Conception: Insights into Infertility, Fertility Preservation, Assisted Reproductive Technology, and Pregnancy Outcomes.Seminars in reproductive medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with rheumatic diseases have unique reproductive health needs. Recent guidelines have been established by various soceities on this topic. However, the education received by women's health providers pertaining to the recognition and management of common rheumatic diseases in patients of childbearing age is not well-defined. This study aims to assess knowledge gaps, specify aspects of care with greatest uncertainty, and assess current resources used by women's health providers in the management of their patients with rheumatic disease.
methodsAn electronic survey was distributed nationally to physicians and allied health professionals who care for reproductive age women. The survey scored participants on their correct responses and confidence ratings in three sections: (1) patients presenting with a new rheumatic disease, (2) contraception in those with a known rheumatic diagnosis, and (3) preconception/antepartum rheumatology medication management. Participants were also asked about resource utilization. Survey questions and scenarios were based on American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology Committee Opinions and the American College of Rheumatology Guidelines for the Management of Reproductive Health in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases. Data were captured using RedCap© and analyzed using descriptive statistics.
resultsThe survey was completed by 200 participants with majority being academic obstetricians and gynecologists. Respondents scored the lowest in recognizing new rheumatic disease presentations in peri-and post-partum periods (28.7%, 95% CI: 25.9-31.6%). Contraception counseling was the area of highest accuracy (57.5%, 95% CI: 54.2-60.8%) and confidence (44.6%, 95% CI: 41.7-47.5%), although areas for contraceptive knowledge expansion exist. Approximately 70% of respondents identified online resources as their main resource used in clinical practice and would prefer more information to be provided as a website, published guidelines, or Smartphone application.
conclusionsWomen's health providers lack educational opportunities to improve knowledge and confidence in managing reproductive-aged patients with rheumatic disease. Recognizing new disease presentations and antepartum medication management were identified as topics with the largest knowledge gaps. Collaborative resources are needed to fill educational needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.