ArticleBMC cancer2026
Strategies for enhancing participation of underrepresented patient populations in cancer clinical trials: learning from "bright spots".
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdequate participation of women, older adults, racial and ethnic subgroups, and other groups, in pivotal trials for cancer therapies is critical for understanding and trusting the safety and efficacy of new medical products across populations. Despite consensus on the importance of representative research and extensive documentation of trial participation barriers, progress has been minimal for most groups, raising the question: What more can be done to enhance participation of underrepresented patient populations in cancer clinical trials, and in turn, improve medical evidence?
methodsWe used a "bright spot" approach to understand what drives successful representation of Black and LatinX patients in cancer clinical trials. We conducted 1-h interviews with "bright spot trial" teams, teams who conducted trials that adequately enrolled Black or LatinX patients relative to disease burden among pivotal trials supporting FDA approval of novel cancer therapeutics between 2012 and 2021, to identify organizational contexts and facilitators associated with success across multiple action levels. Transcripts were analyzed using constant comparative methods.
resultsThirteen participants from 8 bright spot trial teams described a coherent set of strategies associated with representative enrollment, clustering across five levels: patient and community, clinician, trial and site, sponsor organization, and policy. Key practices included prospective budgeting for mitigating participant expenses; patient- and community co-developed educational programs; navigator use; early clinician engagement and referral training; protocol simplification, decentralization, and broadening of eligibility criteria; expansion into community and satellite hospitals affiliated with NCI Designated Cancer Center trial sites; and sustained, non-transactional community partnerships. At the organizational level, "bright spot trial" teams emphasized the importance of executive leadership commitment, real-time dashboarding on enrollment goals, performance-based incentives, employee training, and minimizing reliance on generic vendor solutions.
conclusionsSponsors that achieved representative enrollment in oncology trials shared a common operational playbook: reduce patient and site burden, expand access to where care is delivered, widen trial eligibility, invest in trusted relationships, and embed accountability through leadership, data and incentives. Translating these strategies from bright spots into standard practice, supported by clearer regulatory guidance and evaluation, offers a concrete path toward more accessible and generalizable cancer clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.