Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42288828›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2026

Moral distress among nurses: an umbrella review of its prevalence, severity, causes, and consequences.

Mansour Arad, Masoud Amini, Zakariya Fattahi, Jamal Seidi, Loghman Khaninezhad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mansour AradPh.D. Student in Nursing, Student Research Committee, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Masoud AminiStudent Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
Zakariya FattahiMaster of Critical Care Nursing, Clinical Research Development Center, Imam Reza Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Jamal SeidiClinical Care Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.
Loghman KhaninezhadPh.D. Candidate in Medical Ethics, Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. loghmankhaninezhad1374@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMoral distress is a major ethical and psychological challenge in nursing practice that adversely affects nurses' well-being, patient care quality, and healthcare organizations. This umbrella review aimed to synthesize and critically appraise evidence from existing systematic reviews regarding the prevalence, severity, causes, and consequences of moral distress primarily among nurses across diverse healthcare settings worldwide, with particular attention to regional and contextual variations.

methodsThis umbrella review was conducted according to the JBI methodology for umbrella reviews and reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from inception until 10 March 2025. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses (with or without meta-analysis) published in English were included if they focused on moral distress among nurses or reported extractable nurse-relevant findings within mixed healthcare professional populations. Methodological quality was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses. Due to considerable heterogeneity in populations, settings, and outcome measures, a narrative synthesis was undertaken.

findingsOf 435 records identified, 19 systematic reviews published between 2009 and 2025 met the inclusion criteria. Reported moral distress scores varied across settings and instruments. Higher levels were consistently reported in intensive care, coronary care, and oncology units. Key contributing factors include younger age, female gender, poor teamwork, inadequate resources, and perceived futile or non-beneficial care. Major consequences comprise burnout, depression, reduced quality of nursing care, medication errors, and intention to leave the profession. Significant global and contextual variations were observed.

conclusionMoral distress remains a complex, multifaceted phenomenon influenced by individual, interpersonal, organizational, and systemic factors. Organizational and educational interventions may help mitigate its impact; however, further high-quality research is needed to strengthen the evidence base and inform effective strategies. This umbrella review synthesizes current evidence and highlights important implications for nursing practice, management, education, and future research. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Moral distressNursesSystematic reviewUmbrella review

Identifiers

PMID42288828
PMCPMC13501555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.