ArticleBMC oral health2026
Stress distribution in titanium and zirconia implants with full-arch prostheses: a finite element analysis.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe stress distribution and mechanical properties of materials used in dental implants are critically important for implant success and long-term stability. The aim of this study was to evaluate the stress distribution on implant, prosthetic system, and peri-implant tissues when titanium and zirconia implants are used with different framework materials using three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA).
methodsA three-dimensional edentulous maxilla model was reconstructed from computed tomography data, and twelve finite element models were subsequently developed based on this anatomy to represent different implant and framework configurations. Within the scope of the study, titanium and zirconia implants were modeled in combination with cantilevered and noncantilevered prosthesis types and Co-Cr, PEKK, and zirconium framework materials. An oblique static load of 200 N was applied at a 45° angle in the palato-buccal direction to the central fossa of the first molar on the models. The Von Mises and principal stress distributions in the implant, abutment, screw, framework, and peri-implant bone were examined.
resultsThe highest Von Mises value was recorded in the cantilevered PEKK framework zirconia implant model (378.388 MPa). Compared with the Co-Cr and zirconium framework, the PEKK framework resulted in higher Von Mises stresses and greater prosthesis displacement. The presence of a cantilever increased stress levels in all framework materials, and stress concentrations were observed particularly in posterior abutments and peri-implant bone. Furthermore, stress values in trabecular bone were recorded above the physiological threshold level in the cantilevered PEKK framework models.
conclusionsAlthough zirconia implants exhibited greater stress than titanium implants, they remained within safe limits. Rigid framework materials and cantilever-free designs provide more balanced biomechanical results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.