ArticleBMC health services research2026
Transgender and gender diverse persons' sexually transmitted infection testing: a mixed methods study to understand primary care providers' training gaps and desires to promote sexual health equity.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTransgender (trans) and gender diverse (TGD) people experience sexual health inequities, including high rates of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs), driven by anti-trans stigma. Yet, TGD people also face barriers to STI testing related to anti-trans stigma, including a lack of access to knowledgeable and affirming primary care providers (PCPs), including physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. We sought to understand the current practices, comfort, and knowledge gaps of PCPs in performing gender-affirming STI testing, particularly non-HIV STI testing, among TGD persons, in order to inform future educational interventions.
methodsWe utilized a convergent parallel mixed-methods study design drawing on cross-sectional quantitative surveys (n = 50) and semi-structured qualitative interviews (n = 8) with PCPs (2024-2025). The survey assessed sociodemographic and practice-related characteristics, past training, knowledge of STI testing guidelines, and TGD-related attitudes/biases. Interviews explored how PCPs apply STI testing guidelines and navigate sexual history taking/physical exam among TGD persons. Quantitative data were analyzed using bivariable and multivariable regression analyses to determine factors independently associated with self-reported clinical competency to assess a TGD person. Qualitative data were analyzed using open inductive coding via directed qualitative content analysis.
resultsAmong survey participants (mean age: 38.7, SD: 10.8), almost half (46%) had ≤ 5 h of training on any topic specific to TGD health. PCPs' most desired future training topics included gender-affirming sexual history taking (62%), basic trans healthcare (e.g., gender-affirming hormone therapy [60%]) and STI screening guidelines (56%). Less than half of PCPs were aware of national TGD-specific HIV/STI testing guidance (48%). In multivariable analyses, having ≥ 6 h of training in TGD health (b=0.96, p<.01) and serving more TGD patients (b=0.81, p<.01) were significantly associated with self-reported clinical competency to assess a TGD person. Qualitative findings expanded upon quantitative findings, highlighting how gendered assumptions may influence provider testing recommendations in the absence of TGD-inclusive STI screening guidelines, and how a lack of formalized educational opportunities impede perceived competency, particularly in performing anal cytology for HPV-related cancer screening.
conclusionsFindings underscore the importance of training to improve equitable access to gender-affirming STI screening for TGD populations and mitigate barriers to sexual health equity. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.