Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42288783›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2026

Perceptions of students regarding influential factors in delivering didactic dental lectures.

Sibyl Siluvai, Nandita Kshetrimayum, Darshana Bennadi, Saravanan Av, Prajna Pramod Nayak, Victor Rakesh Lazar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sibyl SiluvaiDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chengalpattu District, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu, 603203, India. sibyls@srmist.edu.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4798-3740
Nandita KshetrimayumDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, Dental College, Regional Institute of Medical Sciences, Manipur, India.
Darshana BennadiDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, Sree Siddhartha Dental College and Hospital, SAHE University, Tumkur, Karnataka, India.
Saravanan AvDepartment of Periodontology, SRM Kattankulathur Dental College and Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chengalpattu District, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu, 603203, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0411-8909
Prajna Pramod NayakDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1467-7130
Victor Rakesh LazarDepartment of Medical Radiology and Imaging Technology, SRM School of Allied Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Chengalpattu District, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu, 603203, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6885-7842

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA challenge faced by numerous educators, particularly those who are young and less experienced, is ensuring effective student learning during didactic dental lectures. The lecture stands as a defining feature of university education, while also being one of its most commonly scrutinized aspects. This study aimed to investigate dental students' attitudes concerning factors that may influence the effectiveness of didactic dental lectures. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis cross-sectional study was carried out involving 280 dental students at a Dental College in Tamil Nadu. The study was carried out over 3 months. The study was conducted using a pretested questionnaire-based assessment. The students participated in the process voluntarily, and the questionnaire was designed to be anonymous, not requiring any names. The initial section gathered the participant's personal details and educational history. The second part consisted of 45 multiple-choice questions focused on the effective factors influencing the teaching of didactic dental courses in classroom settings. Each question has been calculated with three choice scales: (1) Agree, (2) Neutral (3) Disagree.

resultsThe response rate was 100%. 83.2% (n = 233) of respondents were females and 16.7% (n = 47) were males. Table 1 gives the overall attitude of the students towards didactic lectures. The majority of the students (61.4%) had an average attitude towards effective lecturing in didactic dental lectures. There was no significant difference in attitude among the different years.

conclusionIn conclusion, the overall attitude of dental students towards the teaching faculty delivering didactic lectures was positive; however, it is essential to implement continuous monitoring of both faculty and student performance through regular assessments. Lecture-based learning, while inherently passive, can be enhanced through the implementation of interactive teaching modalities.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEducation, DentalStudents, DentalTeachingAdultCross-Sectional StudiesCurriculumFemaleHumansIndiaMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultDental educationDidacticLecturesStudent attitudeTeaching methods

Identifiers

PMID42288783
PMCPMC13488586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.