Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42288782›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2026

Hybrid metaheuristic feature selection for breast cancer detection in digital mammography: a radiomics and deep learning pilot feasibility study.

Bandar Saad Alshreef

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bandar Saad AlshreefDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Shaqra University, Shaqra, Saudi Arabia. bsalshreef@su.edu.sa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9284-4262

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) can improve breast cancer detection in mammography, but high-dimensional feature spaces and feature-selection instability remain challenging. This study developed a hybrid metaheuristic feature-selection framework that combines radiomics and deep learning features and evaluated its methodological feasibility on a small real mammography pilot and a controlled synthetic comparison designed to test behavior under collapse-prone conditions.

methodsUsing the public CBIS-DDSM dataset, 2,051 Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative (IBSI)-compliant radiomic features and 2,048-dimensional deep features from a pretrained, non-fine-tuned EfficientNet-B5 model were extracted for each lesion region of interest (ROI). A hybrid Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm and Crow Search Algorithm (GOA-CSA) with a proposed multi-constraint fitness function was used to select an optimal feature subset for a multilayer perceptron (MLP) classifier. Performance was assessed on a small CBIS-DDSM pilot subset (n = 22, 5-fold stratified cross-validation) and on a synthetic dataset (N = 16, D = 1114) designed to compare the proposed fitness against a legacy fitness under collapse-prone conditions.

resultsOn the CBIS-DDSM pilot, the hybrid GOA-CSA model selected an average of 486 features, achieving a cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.750 ± 0.433 and sensitivity of 0.433 ± 0.435, compared with an all-features baseline AUC of 0.900 ± 0.224 and sensitivity of 0.667 ± 0.471. In the synthetic comparison, the proposed fitness achieved an AUC of 0.810 ± 0.115 and sensitivity of 0.571 ± 0.198 versus 0.476 ± 0.210 and 0.286 ± 0.241, respectively, for the legacy fitness. The collapse-prevention penalty was implemented but was not empirically triggered in this pilot because both models maintained non-zero sensitivity.

conclusionsThis pilot feasibility study demonstrates that the hybrid GOA-CSA framework can successfully identify compact feature subsets combining radiomic and deep features. The results are exploratory and hypothesis-generating, and the small real-data sample size limits definitive performance evaluation. The synthetic experiment supports the conceptual value of the multi-constraint fitness design, but the collapse-prevention penalty remains empirically unvalidated on real mammography data. External validation on independent cohorts such as VinDr-Mammo remains a crucial subject for future work.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningMammographyRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMultilayer PerceptronsPilot ProjectsRadiomicsBreast cancerDeep learningDigital mammographyFeature selectionGOA-CSAMachine learningPilot feasibility studyRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID42288782
PMCPMC13523306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.