Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42288771›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2026

Semiparametric accelerated failure time models with time-varying covariates under partly interval censoring.

Aishwarya Bhaskaran, Ding Ma, Benoit Liquet, Angela Hong, Stephane Heritier, Serigne N Lo, Jun Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aishwarya BhaskaranSchool of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia. aishwarya.bhaskaran@unsw.edu.au.
Ding MaSchool of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Benoit LiquetSchool of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Angela HongMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Stephane HeritierSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Serigne N LoMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jun MaSchool of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

Australian Research Council DP220102249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In survival analysis, accelerated failure time (AFT) models are often used as an alternative to the Cox model. A benefit of the AFT model is that it provides a direct link between covariates and event times, and therefore offers meaningful interpretations of the regression coefficients directly on the event times. This paper is motivated by a randomised clinical trial dataset on advanced melanoma patients, in which the event times are interval-censored and one of the covariates in the model is time-varying. To allow direct assessment of the effects of covariates on the event time, we aim to fit an AFT model. However, there are no readily available computational packages for AFT models with time-varying covariates and interval censoring. In this paper, we propose a maximum penalised likelihood approach for fitting such models. The effectiveness of our method is demonstrated through extensive simulations. Also, an application to the above mentioned melanoma dataset is used to demonstrate practical utility of our method.

Indexed as

MelanomaModels, StatisticalSurvival AnalysisTime FactorsAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansLikelihood FunctionsRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID42288771
PMCPMC13487988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.