ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026
CRISPRessoSea: streamlined analysis and comparison of pooled amplicon CRISPR screens.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCRISPR genome editing enables precise modification of genomic targets but may also induce unintended edits at off-target sites with similar sequences. Pooled amplicon sequencing can assess on- and off-target editing across many samples, yet analyzing, aggregating, and visualizing results from multiple pooled experiments remains challenging. Tools to simplify and standardize these analyses are needed to provide reproducible and comparable interpretation of editing data.
resultsWe developed CRISPRessoSea, a software package that processes, compares, and visualizes genome editing rates from pooled amplicon sequencing experiments. The tool provides standardized workflows for analyzing editing across multiple targets and samples, supports both nuclease- and base-editing modalities, and generates clear, data-rich summaries suitable for downstream interpretation.
conclusionsCRISPRessoSea facilitates reproducible, scalable analysis of CRISPR editing outcomes across diverse experimental designs, enabling more efficient and transparent assessment of genome editing specificity. The software is freely available at https://github.com/clementlab/CRISPRessoSea .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.