Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42288660›Full record

ReviewOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2026

Evaluation of Functional Impacts of Vision Impairment: Progress, Challenges and Future Directions.

Joanne M Wood, Alex A Black, Andrew J Kolarik, Matthew Timmis, Shahina Pardhan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joanne M WoodCentre for Vision and Eye Research, Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. j.wood@qut.edu.au.
Alex A BlackCentre for Vision and Eye Research, Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Andrew J KolarikVision and Eye Research Institute, School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Matthew TimmisCambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences (CCSES), School of Psychology and Sport Science, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.
Shahina PardhanVision and Eye Research Institute, School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vision impairment has profound consequences for everyday functioning and quality of life. This review summarises recent evidence on the impact of vision impairment in three functional domains: mobility and falls risk, driving, and the interaction between vision impairment and hearing. Individuals with vision impairment often adopt more cautious gait and visual search behaviours; however, they remain less stable and at increased falls risk, dependent on the type and severity of vision impairment. Wearable technologies enable continuous measurement of movement in naturalistic settings. Future research should leverage these tools to examine daily mobility patterns, fatigue and environmental exposure, and evaluate interventions in real-world contexts. Both central and peripheral vision play critical roles in driving. However, the impact of vision impairment on driving outcomes depends on the severity of loss as well as drivers' insight into their vision impairment and adoption of behavioural and compensatory strategies. Future studies should incorporate naturalistic driving methods and advanced vehicle technologies to explore compensatory behaviours and interventions and their impact on real-world safety. Hearing abilities may improve or decline following vision loss, depending on the task. Musical perception and pitch discrimination are often enhanced in early-onset blindness, possibly reflecting recruitment of visual cortical areas by auditory processing, while performance on complex spatial hearing tasks can be poorer, as vision calibrates auditory spatial representations. Future research should determine how cross-modal plasticity impacts performance and explore how auditory training or multisensory rehabilitation may enhance functional adaptation. In summary, research highlights the importance of both central and peripheral vision and behavioural adaptations and compensatory strategies, with key challenges being the ability to measure real-world function and understand individual variability. Future work should integrate advanced assessment technologies and interdisciplinary approaches to better characterise functional outcomes and inform interventions to enable functional independence.

Indexed as

AuditionDrivingFallsMobilitySafetyVision impairment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.